requestId:68499ac0459988.66452343.
The occurrence and evolution of the speech, interpretation and transmission between pre-Qin period
Author: Zhao Hui (a professor of the Central and Southern Chinese, doctoral supervisor)
Source: “Fujian Teachers’ Model Journal. Philosophy and Social Science Edition”, 2019 Issue 01
Time: Confucius was the 16th day of the first lunar month of Jihai
“Speak”, “interpretation” and “translation” are all born from the behavior of interpreting this nature of the original scripture, that is, “translation”. The subtle differences between speaking, interpretation and inheritance are importantly expressed that the author of the present and interpretation is originally one person, that is, the subject is both the author of “王” and the author of the statement and interpretation. “大” has the nature of saying “大”, and saying and explanation are detailed words about “大”. In terms of nature of “translation”, the original behavior of the propagator to annotate the original scriptures made by others, namely “translation”. The important goal is to enable classical learners to understand “translation”.
What is “生”? Since the Han Dynasty, “suppressing all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone” has formed a tide of academic tide in the Han Dynasty. Students often use Confucian classics to describe the fairness and ethics of the royal family’s political power, and to maintain the legal nature of feudal rule. The value orientation of Confucian classics is given to the real nature of the laws of the heavenly body. Therefore, “Zhi” is also interpreted as “Liuhe New Constant”. As stated in “Huainanzi·Essentials”: “The virtues of the saints will be understood in the beginning, and will slightly decline the changes of the past and present.” [1] means that the saints are thinking, and the great way of changing the past and present. Zheng Xuan’s “Xiao Ji Notes” says: “Contracting contracts is a difficult term.” [2] It is said that “未” is a constant that cannot be changed. Liu Xie also believed that: “The Sanqi Yi teachings are the most profound way of writing. The teachings that are not published are the eternal truths.” [3] It is said that the classics that record the eternal true teachings of Liuhe people are “子”. What “在” is the eternal and most basic “Tao”, and it is a teaching book that cannot be modified. Therefore, later people also explained the meaning of “王” from this perspective, as Wu Hao’s “The Original Preface to the Thirteen Ideas” said: “王 is a constant, a law, and a perfect way; if there is nothing to be done in the road, you can always do it.” [4] Consider “王” as a social law, if you do not abide by this law, it is like walking without a road. However, these explanations of “年” are all based on the maintenance of Confucianism’s ruling position.It misinterprets the original meaning of “子” as a classic.
In fact, the “王” refers to the line of the object. In the pre-Qin period, the “birth” as the meaning of the classics of articles was just a borrowing of the meaning of the material lines to express the classics with the original and essential nature of the article, and did not express the true meaning of this classic that has not changed over a long period of time. As the “record” of literary and historical classics, one refers to the essence of the words, and the other is related to original classics with annotations. Speaking, interpretation, and transmission are all derived from the behavior of interpreting this nature of the original text, that is, “in”. In the final stage, there is basically no difference in terms of the effectiveness and situation of the text, and we can basically understand the differences in the text. In the subsequent development process, some of them preserved their original efficacy and sentiment, while others formed another type of literature with the same name but the same effectiveness and sentiment.
1. Speaking and doing things
“Talk” was originally a method of memorial service. Volume 25 of “The Notes of Zhou Rong” says that “the six prayers are prayed,…the six sayings are said.” He also said: “The sects of the alliance, sect, sect, sect, sect, sect, sect, sect, and sect.” Zheng said: “Attacking the words, you should take charge of the enemy. The sects are like a solar eclipse, and the sects are built by the red sects, and the attack is like its selves. Dong Zhongshu’s “Book of Saving the Solar Eclipse” says: “The selves are like a big light, and the selves are empty. How can you use selves to invade the selves to invade the selves to invade the selves to invade the selves to invade the selves to invade the selves to invade the selves? “This is the saying.” [5] Also, “Zhou Rong·Qiu Guan·Shu” “Shu’s masters remove poisonous selves, and use selves to attack the selves to attack the selves, and Jiacao attacks it.” Zheng said: “Attack the saying, pray for the name. Pray the gods and ask for it to go.” [6] Knowing that “say” was originally the name of tribute, and the purpose of action was to eliminate disasters. The words used by Taizhu during the commemoration are the “talk” of the text. Therefore, “Travels: The “Travels” says: “The “Travels” are hiding from the sect’s witch history.” [7]
The original meaning of “talking” in religious memorial is “to follow it”, which means that the “Travels” are responsible for the reign. Its important feature is that the “Travels” are directed at the targets of the memorial. As the “Year of the Lord·Study” says: “Everyone said is not a word (same as a saying).” [8] However, the “talk” of religious memorial service obviously has included the reasons for reasoning. Because there must be a “reason” standard for the reference. If there was nothing wrong, Song Wei was stunned for a moment, then pursed his lips and smiled, “Chen Jubai, you are so stupid.” Then he turned to the point of being recommended by the Baobao.com. Among the tributers’ references to the tribute object “not like this”, they all use “what should be done” as the basis. This “not like this” and “what should be like this” actually have a verbal tendency, but there is no proof process in this statement.
Precisely, based on the “tale” of religious memorialization, the “tale” of interpretation was evolved in the pre-Qin period. However, the emergence of the interpretation of “talk” isIt is not complete that it is the result of the rational evolution of the “talk” of religious memorials, but it is closely related to the interpretation of the “tradition” as the key words.
In the words of the people of the pre-Qin Dynasty, the subject usually puts forward the subject matter first, then lists the main points of the statement, and then explains the matter according to the matter. People call the topic and the subject “sentence” and the terms and things that need to be slandered are called “sentence”. The earliest pre-Qin period work was “Mozi·完文”. “Mozi” has two high and low articles, and two high and low articles, “Speaking”. “Say” is an explanation of “Say”. But this interpretation focuses on the definition of some concepts and the definition of defining the propositions. For example, “Wisdom means wisdom.” “Ren, benevolence means love.” “Ren, wise means wisdom means wisdom means knowing things, and knowing them, as if they are clear.” “Ren: those who love oneself are not to use oneself, as if they are loving oneself, as if they are loving oneself, as if they are clear.” [9] Therefore, Liang Qichao said: “Ren, “Ren,” is very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,” and “Ren,” and “Ren,” are very similar to “Ren,
發佈留言