一包養【曹樹明】張岱年師長教師的董仲舒研討

Keywords: Zhang Dainian; Dong Zhongshu; New Materialism

“Zhang Shenfu and Zhang Dainian” Special Column Director of the Director of the People’s Language

Cao Shuming taught Chinese philosophy and philosophy that has been carefully studied by Zhang Dainian for many years Thinking that in recent years, the “Study on the History of Chinese Philosophy” project in charge of the National Social Science Fund project “Zhang Dainian’s Chinese Philosophy History Case Study”, which has gained insights, traceability and micro-reasoning, which can be seen from “Yangming Studies of Teacher Zhang Dainian’s Yangming Studies of Teacher Zhang Dainian’s Yangming Studies”, “Study on the Second Cheng of Teacher Zhang Dainian’s Chinese Philosophy History” and “Study on the Two Books of Teacher Zhang Dainian’s Early Years” and other high-level articles. “Research on Dong Zhongshu by Zhang Dainian Teacher Zhang Zhongshu” published in this journal is the main result of submitting the “2019 China Hengshui Dong Zhongshu and Confucianism International Academic Seminar”. The article proposes that the discussion of Dong Zhongshu’s thoughts by Zhang Dainian has shown a certain theoretical standpoint, a clear philosophical historical method and a profound textual proofreading. It is important to analyze his cosmic and life standpoint from the perspective of “new materialism” standpoint and “ordinary philosophy of the Chinese system”, without touching on political philosophy. This fair and fair and concise review is well understood. Teacher Zhang Dainian not only highly praised that “Dong Zhongshu loved Confucius and determined the value of morality from the beginning”, believed that Dong’s argument that “must be kind and wise” was “deep and clear”, and also evaluated the historical experience of “respecting Confucianism” in the Han Dynasty and the relationship between politics and academics, which is also worthy of our long-term consideration.

Professor and doctoral supervisor of the Marxist School of Languages ​​in Beijing

Zhang Dainian Academic Thought Research and Discussion Professional Committee, China Philosophical History AssociationThe deputy secretary of the association, Dr. Du Changhua, was a study by Zhang Dainian, and was the first to know the article “The Certification Methods in Philosophy after the Qin Dynasty” published in Tianjin in 1932 in the “Zhi Gong News: World Thoughts”, which discovered Dong Zi’s “some ideas that are almost Certification Methods” [1]. In 1933, when summarizing the meaning of “Bengen” or “Yuan”, Zhang Dainian pointed out that Dong Zhongshu’s “Yuan” was a “constitutional meaning” [1] 168. In 1935, in the review of the book written for “History of Chinese Philosophy” for Rongyoulan, Zhang Dainian praised the view of “Dong Zhongshu’s leader Zhang Xing, and the school era ended; Dong Zhongshu’s learning was established, and the learning era began” and believed that this was “a very objective explanation” [2]. However, Dong Zhongshu’s discussions, which are more of the system, are concentrated in the book “Chinese Philosophy” (hereinafter referred to as “Big”) written from 1935 to 1937. After “The Great”, especially after the founding of New China, Zhang Dainian also talked about Dong Zhongshu twice, but 大官网发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发发� Therefore, we use “Bigou” as the middle of the discussion.

1. The discussion of Dong Zhongshu before “Big”

Assessing the meaning of Dong Zhongshu’s discussion of Zhang Dainian, he complained about the founding period of history, which was very stressful and often worked overtime. Constraint is undoubtedly a feasible path. In other words, it means to analyze the value of Dong Zhongshu’s research and discussion from his research and development history.

The concern for Dong Zhongshu that has certain academic meaning can be traced back to Wang Chong, a Donghan scholar who was about two hundred years later. In “Yuheng”, Wang Chongxian talked about Dong Zhongshu, which mostly discussed his problems such as “church sacrifices” and “strategic writings”. There are at most two discussions directly related to the research on Chinese philosophical history: first, 博官网彩彩 pointed out that Dong Zhongshu’s thoughts were from Meng and Xun, and judged their specific contents [2]; second, he believed that Dong Zhongshu was the inheritor and perfect person of Confucius’ thoughts [3]. Of course, Wang Chong’s conclusion is based on his own theory, but it does not lose the reference value. Later Song and Ming wise scholars praised Dong Zhongshu in low overall evaluation. As an exception, the saying “平台 that Dong Zi quoted in “Han Shu” “平台 is not particularly highly praised by them, and Baoqing.com pptCheng Chang even believed that “this is why Dong Zi was the one who saved Yue Zi”[3]324. The two Chengmen Sheng You Zuo also praised Dong Zi’s sentence, “It is only because of his words that he can speak kindly”[4]. Zhu Xi also said: “The Han Confucian scholars are pure and simple, with a little more points, so they say it better. However, there is always a strong saying, and the best thing is to say “righteous and clear”. ”[5] The reason why these two sentences were met by the genius is that their value orientation of “the place of righteousness”[6] is highly different from that of Dong Zi. In the late Qing Dynasty, Dong Zhongshu’s study, age was the focus, and the cap was under the form of academic research. Liao Ping rebelled against the “Wang Lu’s statement” that “beginning with Dong Zi and becoming He Jun”, and believed that “Dong Zi’s establishment was based on the rules and first changed the meaning of “Su Wang” to the words of “Su Wang” as a conscience. This is Dong Zi’s mistake, and later he was eager to correct it. Moreover, he said that the king’s intention was not met, so he entrusted it to “Wang Lu”; the person who entrusted it to “Hang Lu” was actually the root of “King Su” and “Wang Lu” was the branch. Because the king’s intention was not met, he entrusted it to “Wang Lu” to see the meaning of “King Su”. It was Dong Zi’s words that “Wang Lu” and his intention was to be “Su Wang””[7]. Kang Youwei even used the development of Dong Zhongshu’s thoughts to promote the content of Gongyang Three Worlds as the focus, saying: “Dong Sheng even used Confucius as the new king, changed the Zhou system, and used Yin and Zhou as the descendants of the king. The crazy words are hot and the main theme is directed. Kong Men said in a slight manner, so he wrote a big speech. Confucius was the leader of the reform and gave Dong a great success. “[8]”Dong Zi is the clan of “Year” and the new king’s reform was very different. As for the minor meanings, they all came from the text and the Gongyang. ”[9] As we all know, Kang’s concept directly serves his political goal of changing the law and establishing new things. Pixi Ruiyi believes that: “Dong Zi’s “Year and Breeding Lu” invented the “Gongyang” three subjects and nine principles, and is deeply rooted in the study of the destiny of heaven and man. ”[10] The stand that settled in the object of the situation and the discussions of Dong Zhongshu before the Qing Dynasty